Hoverable Dropdown

Hoverable Dropdown

Hoverable Dropdown

Hoverable Dropdown

Hoverable Dropdown

Hoverable Dropdown

Hoverable Dropdown

Hoverable Dropdown

Hoverable Dropdown

Tuesday, 12 May 2020

Has Starmer improved Labour's poll results?

This article was made possible by our Patreon supporters! Special thanks in particular go to our amazing $5 supporters: Ville Forsman, Bert Rothkugel, Alan Spence, Vincent Calabrese, sn, Stephen Kaar, Chloe Hopkins, Alex Wilson, Josuke Higashikata, Harry Jackson, Scott Folan

To support Stats for Lefties on Patreon, visit https://www.patreon.com/leftiestats


---

During the five years in which Jeremy Corbyn was Leader of the Labour Party, countless centrists insisted that anyone other than Corbyn would be 20pts ahead of the Conservatives in opinion polls. Well, Corbyn isn't Labour Leader anymore. So how have the polls changed?

In this article, I'll analyse how the polls have or have not changed since Keir Starmer became Leader of the Labour Party. In short, Labour has made small gains since Starmer won, but it is not 20pts ahead in the polls and it is farther behind the Tories than it was in the 2019 election.

How the polls have changed since Starmer won

Keir Starmer was elected as Labour Leader on April 5th 2020, winning 56% of the popular vote in the first round. In the month since then, Labour's share of the vote in polls has risen slightly, as shown in the graph below.


In the month since Starmer won, Labour's average poll result has increased from 29% to 32% (+3). However, the Tories are still 19pts ahead of Labour on average, and Labour's average poll result of 32% is still 1pt less than the percentage that the party won in the 2019 election.

By my estimate, Labour would win 171 seats in an election based on the poll average in the month since Starmer won; this is an increase of 15 seats compared to my estimate for the poll average in the month before Starmer won. However, the Tories would win a majority of 152 seats.


The main reason for the 3pt increase in Labour's poll average is an increase in support for Labour amongst Remain voters. In the month before Starmer won, Labour was averaging 46% with Remain voters; the party is now averaging 50% (+4), with the Tories on 26% (-), the Lib Dems on 11% (-3), the SNP on 6% (-1) and the Greens on 5% (-1).

Labour's 50% poll average amongst Remainers is higher than the 49% of Remain voters that it won in the 2019 general election. However, it is still lower than the 55% of Remain voters that it won in the 2017 election.


However, amongst Leave voters, there has been no notable change in Labour's support. In the month before Starmer won, Labour was averaging 12% with Leave voters; it is now averaging 13% (+1), with the Tories on 76% (-2), the SNP on 3% (+1), the Greens on 3% (+2) and the Lib Dems on 2% (+1).


Labour's 13% poll average amongst Leavers is lower than the 14% of Leave voters that it won in the 2019 election, and much lower than the 24% of Leave voters that it won in the 2017 election.

Approval ratings

Voting intention polls are not the only polls that have been conducted since Starmer won. Multiple polls have asked voters whether they approve of Starmer's performance as Leader in the month since he became Leader. It is possible to compare these with similar polls of Corbyn's performance and see how voters have changed their perceptions of the Labour Leader.

In the month before Starmer became Leader, Jeremy Corbyn's average approval rating was 20%, with 62% disapproving - a net approval rating of -42pts.

Meanwhile, in the month since Starmer became Leader, Starmer's average approval rating was 32%, with 17% disapproving - a net approval rating of +15pts.

51% of voters either said that they neither approved nor disapproved, or that they didn't know.


Although lots of voters either don't know or neither approve nor disapprove, Starmer's approval rating (32%) is 12pts higher than Corbyn's approval rating in the month before Starmer won. The percentage of voters disapproving of Starmer, meanwhile (17%) is 45pts lower than the percentage who disapproved of Corbyn (62%).

But how do these figures compare to the initial performance of other Labour Leaders? As the graphs below show, every Labour Leader since Michael Foot in 1983 have had positive approval ratings in their first month except for Jeremy Corbyn in 2015. Starmer's average net approval rating of +15pts is the same as Ed Miliband in 2010, slightly lower than Brown in 2007 (+16pts) and Kinnock in 1983 (+20pts), and much lower than Tony Blair in 1994 (+33pts) and John Smith in 1992 (+24pts). His average net approval rating is, however, much higher than Jeremy Corbyn (-9pts) and Michael Foot (+2pts).



One noteworthy statistic is that all Labour Leaders since 1983, with the exception of Jeremy Corbyn and Tony Blair, were initially greeted with a high "Don't know" response: 41% for Miliband, 44% for Brown, 45% for Smith, 54% for Kinnock and 56% for Foot. The high "Don't know" response to Starmer (51%) is thus not particularly unusual when seen in the context of past Leaders.

Best Prime Minister polling

One of the many things that Corbyn was criticised for was the fact that, most of the time, he polled behind David Cameron, Theresa May and Boris Johnson in polls that asked voters who they thought would be the best Prime Minister. So, is Starmer polling better than Corbyn in Best Prime Minister polls?


In short: yes, he is. In the month before Starmer won, Corbyn's average Best PM rating was 16%; in the month since Starmer won, Starmer has averaged 23% in Best PM polls (+7pts). Boris Johnson's average lead in Best PM polls, meanwhile, has fallen from 29pts to 23pts.

2021 will give us a clear answer

Starmer is certainly polling slightly better than Corbyn, but polls are just polls.

In May 2021, elections will be held for 129 seats in the Scottish Parliament, 40 seats in the Welsh Parliament, 25 seats in the London Assembly, over 5,000 seats on 149 local councils, 5 local Mayors, 8 regional Mayors (including London) and 39 Police and Crime Commissioners. The 2021 local elections will thus provide us with a lot of data about Labour's performance and about Keir Starmer's popularity - and will tell us definitively whether or not Starmer has managed to increase Labour's support.

Friday, 1 May 2020

Labour leadership elections: a brief history

This article was made possible by our Patreon supporters! Special thanks in particular go to our amazing $5 supporters: Ville Forsman, Bert Rothkugel, Alan Spence, Vincent Calabrese, sn, Stephen Kaar, Chloe Hopkins, Alex Wilson, Josuke Higashikata, Harry Jackson, Scott Folan

To support Stats for Lefties on Patreon, visit https://www.patreon.com/leftiestats


---

Since 1922, the Labour Party's main figurehead and candidate for Prime Minister has been the person elected to be Leader of the Labour Party. There have been a total of fifteen Leaders since 1922, as well as four acting Leaders. The current Leader, Keir Starmer, was elected by Labour members, affiliated members and registered supporters in a one-person-one-vote election earlier this year; but not every Labour Leader was elected this way.

In this article I'll take a brief look at the different electoral systems used to elect the Leader of the Labour Party since the position was created in 1922:

  • Elected by MPs (1922-1980)
  • Elected by delegates and trade unions voting in an Electoral College (1983-1992)
  • Elected by members, affiliates and MPs/MEPs voting in an Electoral College (1994-2010)
  • One Person, One Vote (2015-present)

Elected by MPs (1922-1980)

Prior to 1983, only Labour Members of Parliament (MPs) could vote in leadership elections. MPs voted using the "exhaustive ballot" system, whereby if one candidate did not win a majority of votes in the first ballot, a second ballot would be held in which the lowest-polling candidate would not be able to stand. If a candidate again failed to win a majority, a third round would be held in which the lowest-polling candidate could not stand, and so on and so forth until somebody won a majority.

Of the 15 Labour Leaders, 8 were elected by Labour MPs, with two Leaders (Arthur Henderson and George Lansbury) elected unopposed. Of the 6 contested leadership elections in 1922-1980, only two elections were vaguely close:

  • 1922: Ramsay MacDonald won by a margin of 5 votes (4.2%).
  • 1980: Michael Foot won by a margin of 10 votes (3.7%)


Electoral College (1983-1992)

In 1981, Labour Party conference voted to change the system for electing the Leader. Now, instead of being elected by MPs, the Leader would be elected at Labour Party conference by Constituency Labour Party (CLP) delegates, MPs / MEPs and trade unions.

However, instead of all of the votes contributing equally to the result (as they do now), these three groups (unions, CLPs and MPs / MEPs) would make up a particular share of the overall result. Votes cast by trade unions would make up 40% of the result, votes from CLPs would make up 30%, and votes from MPs / MEPs would make up 30% of the result.

If no candidate won a majority of the overall Electoral College result in the first ballot, a second ballot would be held, and a third, and a fourth etc., until somebody won a majority.

The first Leader elected using this system was Neil Kinnock in 1983, who won 73% of the vote with trade unions, 92% of the vote with CLP delegates and 49% of the vote with MPs / MEPs. When the overall result was calculated, Kinnock thus won 71% of the Electoral College result in the first ballot.



The Electoral College system did not produce any particularly unusual results in leadership elections - Kinnock won a clear victory in all three sections of the party in 1983 and 1988, as did John Smith in 1992.

However, the system was also used to elect the Deputy Leader, and the 1981 deputy leadership election is an interesting demonstration of how the electoral system can affect the result.



As the table above shows, when Tony Benn challenged Denis Healey for the deputy leadership in 1981, he won an overwhelming majority amongst CLP delegates. However, the trade unions overwhelmingly backed Healey, as did the PLP. As a result, Benn narrowly lost to Healey in the second ballot in the overall Electoral College result.

Electoral College (1994-2010)

After John Smith became Labour Leader in 1992, Labour Party conference voted to make some changes to the Electoral College system. First, the Leader would no longer be elected at conference, but would instead be elected through a postal ballot of members, members of affiliated trade unions and MPs / MEPs. Second, each section's share of the Electoral College would be equal at 33.33% (instead of unions having 40% and the other two sections having 30%).

The first Leader elected using this system was Tony Blair in 1994. Gordon Brown would have been elected using this system, but as he recieved nominations from over 90% of Labour MPs / MEPs, he was elected unopposed.



The 2010 leadership election was the first time that one section of the party had voted for a different candidate than the other two sections. In this instance, members and MPs / MEPs voted for David Miliband in the final round, but members of affiliated trade unions and other affiliates voted for Ed Miliband. Ed Miliband went on to win in the overall Electoral College result by a margin of 0.7pts.

The 1994-2010 Electoral College was notable as being the first time that a major British political party had allowed individual party members, and members of affiliated trade unions and other affiliates, to vote in a leadership election. In 1994, nearly 1 million people voted in the Labour Party's leadership election, with Tony Blair winning a total of 508,148 individual votes - the most of any person to ever become Labour Leader.

One Person, One Vote (2015-present)

In 2014, a specially organised Labour conference voted to introduce a new system for electing the Labour Party Leader. There were three main changes made.

Firstly, all votes cast in the leadership election would now count equally towards the result, with no weighting. Secondly, members of affiliated unions would now need to specifically register for a vote in the leadership election, instead of being given a vote automatically. Finally, UK voters who were not party members would be able to register for a vote in the leaderhip election by paying a small amount of money and stating that they agreed with the values of the Labour Party.

The first Leader elected using this system was Jeremy Corbyn in 2015. He was succeeded in 2020 by Keir Starmer.



The number of votes cast by party members in 2020 was 401,521 - the most votes cast by party members in any leadership election in British history (although the total turnout across all sections of the party was slightly lower than in the 2016 leadership election).

The graph below shows the turnout amongst Labour party members from 1994-2020.